Sitting in on a typical Platte County School Board meeting is about as exciting as watching a cat sleep. This Monday however, that cat will be a lion, and it won't be napping.
The February 15 board of trustees meeting will be the first since January 18, when the board voted 4-3 to remove the "No Place for Hate" banners because the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) program is partially sponsored by the Colorado Gay and Lesbian Fund (CGLF). The banners, which had been up at Wheatland High School (WHS) since fall, include the CGLF logo along with those of the other sponsors.
Shortly after the Jan. meeting, the banners were taken down, the ADL reluctantly removed WHS from the list of 25 regional schools who had earned the honor of being "No Place for Hate", and Wheatland was in the spotlight. The four board members who voted to remove the banners were interviewed by local and state newspapers, and students responded by putting NPFH posters on their lockers, and forming a Facebook page to rally support to get the banners put back up. The Platte County Record Times devoted extra space to print the many letters from WHS alumni, parents and residents who disapproved of the board's decision, as well as a handful from those who agreed with the removal of the banners. Wheatland's "Banning the Banner" became news all around Wyoming, and then the nation.
Despite what appears to be keen interest on both sides of the banner issue, and what could be a record turnout Monday, the February board meeting will be held in its regular venue, the meeting room at the Administration Office, at 1350 Oak St. As of this writing, the only time allotted to any discussion of the NPFH banners will be during the ten minute "Public Comment" period. (This is usually at the beginning of the meeting, so public, you have been warned; don't be late.)
ADL representative Bruce DeBoskey has formally requested time at the meeting to present facts about the NPFH program, and to answer any questions and address misconceptions the board or the public may have. DeBoskey will be at Monday's meeting, although as of this writing his Feb. 3 request to be included on this month's agenda still has not been granted.
PCSD1 Superintendent Stuart Nelson has also declined individual requests from Platte County residents to be included on the agenda regarding the banner. As of this writing, there is no Agenda available to the public on the
district's website.
According to Jason Marsden, of the Matthew Shepard Foundation in Denver, individual board members had not returned calls from the ADL. However, Chuck Ruwart, who voted with Dallas Mount and Jay Haux to keep the NPFH banners up, has not received a phone call from the ADL, or had any other communication from them besides a form given to each board member shortly after January's vote.
Two weeks after the board's decision, Superintendent Nelson told The Wyoming Tribune Eagle that the "...only negative comments [he has heard about the board's decision] had come from out-of-towners, special interest groups, and former residents" and that “…every local parent he'd spoken with supported the board's decision.”
Another two weeks have gone by and if that was true then, it's not any more.
Part of Monday's meeting will likely include the presentation of a petition designed to keep the NPFH banner issue alive by requesting a definition of policies currently in place in local schools, and signed by local residents.
Wyo. Stat. 21-3-110(a)(viii) requires the School Board to "Consider every petition presented to the board and subscribed by at least five (5) citizens of the school district and take some action on such petition within thirty (30) days after it is received; provided, that no action shall be required if the precise question presented by the petition has been considered and acted upon by the board of trustees at any meeting held within the current fiscal year." In effect, any five people, who live in the district, can force the board to include an item on their agenda, and to vote on it, as long as the school board has not voted on the exact same thing within the same fiscal year.
Stepping up onto soapbox: If this issue is important to you, go to the meeting. Whichever side you're on, be respectful of those who disagree with you. Listen. Ask questions. Don't jump to conclusions. Wheatland will learn something from this, and everyone has something to contribute to that.
The Mission statement of PCSD1 is available on their website, and it's exactly what I'd like to hold them to. It's worth it for all to take the time to read (or re-read) it, so here it is:
Our Mission
The District is committed to the process of continuous school improvement.
The board, administration, and the staff will model a positive, professional working relationship by:
•Operating openly and honestly.
•Establishing two-way communication and problem solving with our patrons.
•Following a chain of command when solving problems.
•We will jointly celebrate our successes and give credit to those responsible for our successes.
Our vision is to prepare children to become citizens for a 21st Century workplace.
If you're attending Monday's meeting, or if you're one of the people who've publically declared your support for the banner and the NPFH program, in letters to the editor or out on the streets of Wheatland, constructively holding the district accountable to the vision declared in their mission statement would be an excellent place to start.